{"id":86,"date":"2017-06-03T21:49:45","date_gmt":"2017-06-03T21:49:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/?p=86"},"modified":"2017-06-03T21:49:45","modified_gmt":"2017-06-03T21:49:45","slug":"taking-high-compensation-without-dividend-danger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/2017\/06\/03\/taking-high-compensation-without-dividend-danger\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking High Compensation Without Dividend Danger"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"csD270A203\"><em>Preface: Proper planning can maximize the amount of compensation\u00a0a company can pay in a way that will increase its chances of being able to withstand an IRS challenge.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><strong>Taking High Compensation Without Dividend Danger<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">Owners of a closely held C corporation know that the company&#8217;s earnings are theoretically exposed to a double tax. Principally, earnings are first taxed to the corporation and those that are distributed to\u00a0as dividends are taxed on your individual income tax return, without the company getting a deduction for the payments. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">On the other hand, the company can deduct the salary it pays you. While you have to pay tax on the salary, unlike dividends, salary is taxed only once. And while dividend income is taxed at net capital gains rates (at a maximum 20 percent rate if all income exceeds a $470,700 threshold for joint filers, $418,400 for single individuals in 2017), that is an additional 15 or 20 percent that you may not otherwise have to pay with proper compensation planning. What&#8217;s more, investment income is also subject to the 3.8 percent Net Investment Income (NII) surtax if an individual\u2019s overall income exceeds a $250,000\/$200,000 level.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">Does this mean that the double tax can be avoided simply by increasing your salary rather than by paying dividends? No, there are two potential problems with that approach. First, the company can only deduct reasonable compensation. Second, if compensation is set at the high end of the scale and is later found to be unreasonable, the IRS can charge the owner with a constructive dividend on the unreasonable portion of the compensation. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">What then can be done? Proper planning can maximize the amount of compensation the company can pay in a way that will increase its chances of being able to withstand an IRS challenge. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">The basic test of reasonableness, as applied by the IRS and many courts, is whether the amount paid is analogous to that paid by employers in like businesses to equally qualified employees for similar services. In this respect, the total compensation package is examined including contributions to retirement plans and other employee benefits. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">As a result, a showing of special skills may help to justify reasonableness. It also can be helpful if the individual performs different roles for the company (for example, chief executive officer and designer of a new product). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">Another possible approach may be to set up a portion of an owner&#8217;s compensation to be paid as bonuses if profits meet certain levels. While the IRS has attacked such contingent compensation arrangements in family companies, some courts have upheld them where the agreement was set up when the business was started or when the amount of the future earnings was questionable, and the agreement was consistently followed during the ups and downs of the business. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">Few businesses start out with the owners able or willing to pay themselves what they are really worth. Even after the business is successful, periods of economic slowdown, may force belt tightening. It is in these situations that an owner may have an opportunity to enter into a formal contract with the company calling for a share of the profits as added compensation when things improve. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">If this is done it&#8217;s important to include in the corporate minutes the record showing that the owner was underpaid at the time the agreement was entered into. The minutes also should show that the contingent payment out of future profits is merely intended to provide an incentive for the owner to put forth his best efforts to build the business and to make up for the periods of underpayment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">A<\/span><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">ttention to such details when planning compensation arrangements should help the owner fend off or blunt future attacks on compensation when the business proves highly successful and substantial compensation is paid under the agreement. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"csD270A203\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">Feel free to contact us if we can help you with the complex task of developing a proper compensation package for tax purposes. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"cs865897ED\"><span class=\"cs63EB74B2\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Preface: Proper planning can maximize the amount of compensation\u00a0a company can pay in a way that will increase its chances of being able to withstand an IRS challenge. Taking High Compensation Without Dividend Danger Owners of a closely held C corporation know that the company&#8217;s earnings are theoretically exposed to a double tax. Principally, earnings &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/2017\/06\/03\/taking-high-compensation-without-dividend-danger\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Taking High Compensation Without Dividend Danger&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":87,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86\/revisions\/87"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saudercpa.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}